Monday, August 20th 2018

Apple iPad (Nasdaq:AAPL) Edition of Wall Street Journal Worth $18 a Month?


Saturday, March 27th, 2010

Some reports have the Apple iPad (Nasdaq:AAPL) edition of the Wall Street Journal being offered at $17.99 a month, which has generated a lot feedback from bloggers who say that the price is too high, no matter how good the content and quality is offered.

The price of the paper edition of the Journal is $29 a month, while online access to the Journal is offered at $1.99 weekly.

There as been some confusion out there as to why the prices will be different, with some mentioning the content may be different or the physical edition more expensive to produce. Both of which could be true.

As far as the physical edition of the Journal that's obviously more labor intensive and uses paper, so the costs will obviously be more in that regard. But the digital edition for the iPad, if it includes multimedia, would have a different set of additional costs from programmers; but that's yet to be seen in the product, and wouldn't be near as high as all the labor and organization needed to put out the physical Wall Street Journal.

Assuming it is a pretty straightforward edition and not a lot of difference between the two, it then comes to price and whether $17.99 a month is too steep.

Most input so far has come back as being too steep, but then again, the users will have the final say on that, and until it is released and in the marketplace for a while, we won't know.

Rupert Murdoch knows the demographic the Wall Street Journal serves, and for the most part it won't be that the cost is too high, as most people reading it will be in the upper end of the economic spectrum.

The real question to me will be if people will want to carry around an iPad to read the Wall Street Journal and why they would.

The other question is if they do respond positively to it, will it cannibalize the physical Wall Street Journal.

I think with advertising gravitating to the web and no end in site as to when that will level off, Murdoch may not care that much if there is some cannibalization of the original WSJ, as lower labor costs and higher margins, along with increasing advertising revenue is a winner, and that's what the media business has been looking for for a number of years.

Now we have to find out if $17.99 is too much or not. That's important because it seems the days or advertising driving the revenue and profits of a business on its own are over. So finding the right subscription price and advertising base is the future for media companies.



Article by Gary B

The views expressed are the subjective opinion of the article's author and not of FinancialAdvisory.com



Follow financeadvisory on Twitter

SHARE THIS ARTICLE :

Tags: apple ipad, rupert murdoch, wall street journal

Related Articles
Is Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) iPad a Threat to Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)?
The Apple iPad could conquer the Nintendo DS in handheld gaming

Comments:

DB (March 29, 2010 7:33 AM)
Way too steep. Good pub, but agree that you can get most info for free. If you paid 25-30cents per day that's about 8-9 /month. Guess it depends on how good the ipad version really is. I'll be 4.99 is a reasonable ipad price point. 9.99? Not sure I'd do that or not...
Julian (March 28, 2010 9:16 PM)
The Wall Street Journal is Dreaming.... Who would pay that much!?? $9.99 seems reasonable, but even then I still think its high... I for one will be viewing other financial News for Free! Just like most of the people out there already! mark included(9:37am)
Ari Tafari (March 28, 2010 1:08 PM)
The initial subscription price should be reasonable (I suggest $9.99) in order to attract as many eyeballs as possible. I think most subscribers will understand (and accept) a gradual increase in price over a period of time.
Tim (March 28, 2010 12:55 PM)
Love the iPad and mine will be arriving on Saturday (April 3rd) and I don't mind paying for the content. $17.99 is too high. A user will have multiple subscriptions and to charge $17.99 for one is ridiculous.
mark (March 28, 2010 9:37 AM)
No way will I pay a dime for content on the ipad. Too many good sources of FREE financial news already out there. Sick of APPLE trying to monetize the internet.... No flash?? Brutal. I predict a big resurgence of all things Windows over the next couple of years.
iPad (March 28, 2010 8:29 AM)
Wow this Sucks Balls
Ricky (March 28, 2010 4:30 AM)
I am not sure the price is too high given the demographic, but what will definitely kill the uptake will be if they play stupid games like expire the content after a short period, which Murdoch did with his other forays into electronic publishing of his newspapers. This is the single major factor that has inhibited the take up on the PC. Let's hope they have learnt from this.!
Post a Comment

Comments:*


Name:*


Enter Verification Number:*


Give Your Opinion
Which is currently the most expensive stock on the US Stock Market?
Share a simple answer to help inform others:
Specific to any country?
First name / Alias

• Your answer will be posted here:
Which is currently the most expensive stock on the US Stock Market?
Financial Questions & Answers
Ask A Question
Get opinions on what you want to know:
Specific to any country?